“The answers you get depend on the questions you ask”

“The answers you get depend on the questions you ask.” – Thomas S. Kuhn

This is a profound statement that goes to the heart of our cultural and political troubles. Here is a good question to ask: “Why have we suffered through the greatest wealth transfer in history the last eight years – wealth being transferred by the trillions and trillions of dollars from the poor and middle class to the very wealthy?”
Why is no one asking that question? Why no one is asking that question is another excellent question to ask. Perhaps the reason no one is asking is because the answer would lead to the demise of 100% of the Democrat Party and perhaps 80% of the Republican Party. I suspect that is the answer to why very few candidates (and only those leaning libertarian) and virtually no one in the mainstream media has bothered to ask that question.
We do not ask the questions because we do not want to deal with the consequences of the answers. We almost always ask questions which we know beforehand the answers will be advantageous to us – no unpleasant consequences to have to deal with. Answers which will never compel us to have to say, “I am sorry, I was wrong.” Answers which will never place personal accountability on ourselves. Answers where it is always the fault or responsibility of someone else for our predicament.
A great deal of our collective insanity stems from our refusal to ask the questions which may result in answers with real consequences for ourselves. After someone has spent day after day, week after week, year after year berating others as being wrong – it is exceedingly difficult to ask the question for which the answer may be that the one doing the berating was also the one who was incorrect. As a culture we have lost the ability to confess to being in error and the consequence of that is that we have also lost the ability to learn. We have gained the ability to be manipulated by anyone who comes along and offers us an exit from the dreaded, “I am sorry, I was wrong.”
No matter how ludicrous, absurd or insane the option may be – as a society we inevitably take the option that allows to escape having to say, “I am sorry, I was wrong.”
This is not good for our mental health. That these ludicrous, absurd or insane options are what we most often prefer to truth – or even the most vague attempt at discovering the truth – has created a society of automatons who ask no more questions that what the political structure and media instruct them to ask. The political structure and media will never instruct them to ask questions which are not advantageous to the political structure and media. Ever.
So, why have we suffered through the greatest wealth transfer in history the last eight years – wealth being transferred by the trillions and trillions of dollars from the poor and middle class to the very wealthy? Why is no one asking that question? Pursue truthful answers to those two questions and the revolution will become very real very quickly.

The Destruction Continues Unabated

The American Left is a mysterious ideology. Arguably the American Left is nothing more than nihilism. They will make league with anyone as long as it furthers the goal of destroying the status quo – regardless of what that status quo may be. The Left will take the ‘enemy-of-my-enemy’ argument to absurdity because the enemy they have identified is the status quo – and anyone and anything the Left views as being destructive to the status quo is their friend.

This pattern feeds on itself because the more destruction the Left inflicts, the worse things get and the more the Left blames the status quo hence making an ever stronger argument for destruction hence making things even worse. Wash rinse repeat. The Left conveniently ignores that most of the misery in this country is a direct result of the policies they have supported in the past and completely dismiss the notion that what they support today will produce further misery in the future.
The method the Left chooses in order to inflict destruction is control. The most popular, but not only, means of inflicting control is via government. For example John Marshall observed long ago that “the power to tax is the power to destroy.” The Federal tax code alone is 70,000 pages. No end to destruction there.
Republicans are almost helpless in opposing this destruction due to there being a critical mass of Republicans who are completely reactive animals. If the Left is for something then a critical mass of Republicans will take a position 180 degrees opposed to what the Left is for. These Republicans automatically assume that because the Left is wrong and bent on destruction that to take a position 180 degrees opposed to the Left automatically makes them correct. In truth what it makes these Republicans is completely manipulatable and the Left is well aware of this and entrap these Republicans in morally and intellectually indefensible positions on a daily basis.
The Left then points to the example of these reactive Republicans holding intellectually and morally indefensible positions as evidence that further destruction of the status quo is required. Wash rinse repeat.
There are a number of reasons why the Left pays no price for holding positions that are intellectually and morally indefensible while the Republicans always pay a price for doing that. One of those reasons are the major media outlets are overwhelmingly Left. Another reason why is that, when caught in an intellectually and morally indefensible position, these reactive Republicans will take the defense of those positions to their own levels of absurdity.
Meanwhile nothing useful gets done and the destruction continues unabated.

“No barriers, no borders, we all just need to co-exist”

Today Katy Perry said “No barriers, no borders, we all just need to co-exist.”
Aside from what I am sure is the hypocrisy of having her own security detail and the never ending popularity of assuming John Lennon songs are a solid basis for policy making – what possible evidence is there that getting rid of barriers and borders would make us safer, happier and more content? This is one of those assertions so often made for which the sum total of evidence to back up the assertion is wishful thinking.
Michael Yon (whom I suggest you follow on Facebook) has made the astute observation that not all fish can live in the same fishbowl together without killing each other. A considerable number of people find this reality to be in conflict with their ideology. Inevitably when this conflict occurs then the ideology wins, as in the case of Ms. Perry. This is not a trite matter because the consequences are for innocent people to die.
That so many in the Western Hemisphere cannot comprehend the simple reality that not all people and not all cultures can co-exist peacefully is in no small part a major contributing factor to our collective insanity. The very effort to make the attempt to distinguish who can and cannot co-exist peacefully is most often labeled racist or xenophobic by those who share Ms.Perry’s belief system. Yet the more prevalent this belief system “No barriers, no borders, we all just need to co-exist” becomes the more violence we experience and the more innocent people die.
It would seem a good step in the direction of recovering our sanity is to stop listening to the philosophical renderings of pop music icons.
There is connection here and that connection is not without consequences.

You and I are Unspeakably Wealthy.

Every once in a while, I think about the incomprehensible material wealth of modern society. The way you and I live. That’s vague and lofty, so let me be more specific.
 
I had a bowl of beef stew for lunch. I sat reading articles longer than I intended so the bowl dried kind of brown and hard. I put it in the sink, turned on the hot water, let it flow and overflow, and then then grabbed the dishbrush to scrub away the crust. Simple.
 
But that quart or or two of hot water had to first come to me clean through delivered pipes, and then be heated, and sit in a tank, just waiting for me to turn a knob. Any impoverished waif could do it. But, how miraculous is that process?
 
Billionaire John D. Rockefeller would have had to expend far greater resources to get a clean-ish bowl placed in the sink. A servant would have had to draw water from the well. There would have to be a kettle boiling, or at least simmering.That would have taken another servant to relay some wood or load some coal to the iron stove. And smoke would filter through the house.
 
John D might have been the richest man in the world or close, but his life was a campout compared to ours. Would you rather be a billionaire in the early 20th century or a commoner today?

ᎣᏍᏓ ᏒᎯᏰ

ᎤᏂᏣᏘᏃ ᏫᏚᎪᎲ ᎤᏌᎯᎸ ᎤᎿᎭᎷᏎᎢ, ᎤᏪᏅᏃ ᎬᏩᏍᏓᏩᏗᏙᎯ ᎬᏩᎷᏤᎴᎢ. ᎠᎰᎵᏃ ᎤᏍᏚᎢᏒ ᏚᏪᏲᏁ ᎯᎠ ᏄᏪᏎᎢ; ᎣᏏᏳ ᎢᏳᎾᎵᏍᏓᏁᏗ ᎤᏲ ᎢᏳᎾᏛᎿᎭᏕᎩ ᏚᎾᏓᏅᏛᎢ; ᎤᎾᏤᎵᏰᏃ ᎦᎸᎳᏗ ᎡᎯ ᎤᎬᏫᏳᎯ ᎨᏒᎢ. ᎣᏏᏳ ᎢᏳᎾᎵᏍᏓᏁᏗ ᎤᏲ ᎤᎾᏓᏅᏔᏩᏕᎩ, ᏛᎨᏥᏄᏬᎯᏍᏔᏂᏰᏃ. ᎣᏏᏳ ᎢᏳᎾᎵᏍᏓᏁᏗ ᎤᎾᏓᏅᏘ, ᎦᏙᎯᏰᏃ ᎤᎾᏤᎵ ᎢᏳᎵᏍᏙᏗ. ᎣᏏᏳ ᎢᏳᎾᎵᏍᏓᏁᏗ ᎤᏂᏲᏏᏍᎩ ᎠᎴ ᎤᏂᏔᏕᎩᏍᎩ ᎤᎾᏓᏅᏘ ᎢᏳᎾᎵᏍᏙᏗᏱ; ᏛᎨᏥᎧᎵᎵᏰᏃ. ᎣᏏᏳ ᎢᏳᎾᎵᏍᏓᏁᏗ ᎤᎾᏓᏙᎵᏣᏘ, ᏛᎨᏥᏙᎵᏥᏰᏃ. ᎣᏏᏳ ᎢᏳᎾᎵᏍᏓᏁᏗ ᏧᏓᏅᎦᎸᏛ ᏧᏂᎾᏫ, ᎤᏁᎳᏅᎯᏰᏃ ᎤᏂᎪᏩᏛᏗ; ᎣᏏᏳ ᎢᏳᎾᎵᏍᏓᏁᏗ ᎠᏃᎯᏍᏗᏍᎩ, ᎤᏁᎳᏅᎯᏰᏃ ᏧᏪᏥ ᏛᎨᎪᏎᎵ. ᎣᏏᏳ ᎢᏳᎾᎵᏍᏓᏁᏗ ᎤᏲ ᎢᎨᎬᎾᏕᎩ ᏚᏳᎪᏛ ᎨᏒ ᎤᏂᏍᏛᏗᏍᎩ, ᎤᎾᏤᎵᏰᏃ ᎦᎸᎳᏗ ᎡᎯ ᎤᎬᏫᏳᎯ ᎨᏒᎢ. ᎣᏏᏳ ᎢᏣᎵᏍᏓᏁᏗ ᎢᏳᏃ ᏴᏫ ᎤᏐᏅ ᏂᎨᏥᏪᏎᎮᏍᏗ ᎠᎴ ᎤᏲ ᏂᎨᏨᏁᎮᏍᏗ, ᎠᎴ ᏂᎦᎥ ᏧᏓᎴᏅᏛ ᎤᏐᏅ ᎦᏰᎪᎩ ᎨᏥᏃᎮᏍᎨᏍᏗ ᎠᏴ ᎨᏒ ᎢᏥᏍᏛᏗᏍᎨᏍᏗ. ᎢᏣᎵᎮᎵᎨᏍᏗ ᎠᎴ ᎤᏣᏔᏅᎯ ᎣᏍᏛ ᎢᏣᏓᏅᏖᏍᏗ, ᎤᏣᏘᏰᏃ ᎡᏣᎫᏴᎡᏗ ᎦᎸᎳᏗ; ᎾᏍᎩᏯᏰᏃ ᎤᏥ ᏂᏚᏅᏁᎸᎩ ᎠᎾᏙᎴᎰᏍᎩ ᎢᎬᏱ ᏥᏂᎨᏤᏅᎡᎸ. ᏂᎯ ᎠᎹ ᎡᎶᎯ ᎤᏤᎵᎦ; ᎢᏳᏍᎩᏂ ᎠᎹ ᏳᏥᏍᎪᎸ ᎦᏙ ᏱᎦᎵᏍᏙᏓ ᎠᎹ ᏯᏙᏢᎾ; ᎥᏝ ᎿᎭᏉ ᎪᎱᏍᏗ ᎬᏙᏗ ᏱᎦᎩ, ᎠᏗᏅᏗᏉ ᎤᏩᏒ, ᎠᎴ ᏴᏫᏉ ᎤᎾᎳᏍᏓᎡᏗ. ᏂᎯ ᎢᎦ ᎢᏣᏘᏍᏗᏍᎩ ᎡᎶᎯ. ᎦᏚᎲ ᎤᏌᎯᎸ ᏥᎦᎧᎰᎢ ᎥᏝ ᏰᎵ ᏴᎦᏰᎬᏍᎦᎸᎦ. ᎥᏝ ᎠᎴ ᏴᏫ ᎠᏂᏨᏍᏛᎦ ᎠᏨᏍᏙᏗ ᎠᏟᎶᏍᏗ ᏯᏄᏢᏗᏍᎪᎢ, ᎦᎪᏗᏱᏍᎩᏂ ᎠᏂᎧᎲᏍᎪᎢ, ᎢᎦᏃ ᎤᎾᏘᏍᏓᏁᎰ ᏂᎦᏛ ᎦᎵᏦᏕ ᎠᏂᏯᎢ. ᎢᎦ ᎢᏣᏘᏍᏗᏍᎬ ᏚᏂᎸᏌᏓᏕᎮᏍᏗ ᏴᏫ, ᎾᏍᎩᏃ ᎣᏍᏛ ᏕᏥᎸᏫᏍᏓᏁᎲ ᎠᏂᎪᏩᏘᏍᎨᏍᏗ, ᎠᎴ ᎠᏂᎸᏉᏗᏍᎨᏍᏗ ᎢᏥᏙᏓ ᎦᎸᎳᏗ ᎡᎯ. ᏞᏍᏗ ᏗᎧᎿᎭᏩᏛᏍᏗ ᎠᎴ ᎠᎾᏙᎴᎰᏍᎩ ᏚᏲᏍᏔᏂᎸ ᏱᏍᎩᏰᎵᏎᎮᏍᏗ; ᎥᏝᏍᎩᏂ ᏱᏓᎩᏲᏍᏔᏂᎸ, ᏓᎩᎧᎵᎵᎸᏍᎩᏂ. ᎤᏙᎯᏳᎯᏯᏰᏃ ᎯᎠ ᏂᏨᏪᏎᎭ, ᎬᏂ ᎦᎸᎶᎢ ᎠᎴ ᎡᎶᎯ ᎠᏂᎶᏐᏅᎭ ᏌᏉ ᎤᏍᏗ ᎠᎴ ᏌᏉ ᏭᏍᏗᎬ ᏗᎧᎿᎭᏩᏛᏍᏗ ᎥᏝ ᏴᎦᎶᎯ ᎬᏂ ᏂᎦᏗᏳ ᎠᎧᎵᏨᎭ. ᎾᏍᎩ ᎢᏳᏍᏗ ᎩᎶ ᎠᏲᏍᏗᏍᎨᏍᏗ ᏌᏉ ᎯᎠ ᎤᏍᏗᎧᏂ ᎤᎵᏁᏨᎢ, ᎠᎴ ᎾᏍᎩ ᏄᏍᏕᏍᏗ ᏴᏫ ᏕᎨᏲᎲᏍᎨᏍᏗ, ᎾᏍᎩ ᎤᏍᏗᎧᏂ ᎠᎪᏎᎮᏍᏗ ᎦᎸᎳᏗ ᎡᎯ ᎤᎬᏫᏳᎯ ᎨᏒᎢ; ᎩᎶᏍᎩᏂ ᏓᎧᎿᎭᏩᏕᎨᏍᏗ, ᎠᎴ ᎾᏍᎩ ᏄᏍᏕᏍᏗ ᏓᏕᏲᎲᏍᎨᏍᏗ, ᎦᎸᏉᏗᏳ ᎠᎪᏎᎮᏍᏗ ᎦᎸᎳᏗ ᎡᎯ ᎤᎬᏫᏳᎯ ᎨᏒᎢ. ᎯᎠᏰᏃ ᏂᏨᏪᏎᎭ, ᎢᏨᏃ ᎾᏍᎩ ᎢᏣᏓᏅᏘ ᎨᏒ ᏂᏗᏥᎪᎾᏛᏔᏅᎾ ᎢᎨᏎᏍᏗ ᏗᏃᏪᎵᏍᎩ ᎠᎴ ᎠᏂᏆᎵᏏ, ᎥᏝ ᎦᎸᎳᏗ ᎡᎯ ᎤᎬᏫᏳᎯ ᎨᏒ ᏴᎨᏥᏴᎭ. ᎢᏣᏛᎦᏅᎯ ᎢᎩ ᎯᎠ ᏥᏂᎨᏥᏪᏎᎴ ᎡᏘ ᏣᏁᎮᎢ; ᏞᏍᏗ ᏣᏓᎸᎩ; ᎠᎴ ᎩᎶ ᎠᏓᎯᎮᏍᏗ ᎬᏩᏍᏛᏗᏍᏗ ᎨᏎᏍᏗ ᏗᏄᎪᏗᏍᎩᏱ. ᎠᏎᏃ ᎠᏴ ᎯᎠ ᏂᏨᏪᏎᎭ; ᎩᎶ ᏗᎾᏓᏅᏟ ᎠᏍᎦᎨᏍᏗ ᎪᎱᏍᏗ ᏄᏍᏛᏗᏍᎬᎾ ᎢᎨᏎᏍᏗ, ᎬᏩᏍᏛᏗᏍᏗ ᎨᏎᏍᏗ ᏗᏄᎪᏗᏍᎩᏱ; ᎩᎶᏃ ᏗᎾᏓᏅᏟ ᏂᏣᏓᏅᏛᎾ ᎢᎪᏎᎮᏍᏗ, ᏕᎦᎳᏫᎥ ᎬᏩᏍᏛᏗᏍᏗ ᎨᏎᏍᏗ; ᎩᎶᏃ ᏣᏁᎫ ᎢᎪᏎᎮᏍᏗ, ᎬᏩᏍᏛᏗᏍᏗ ᎨᏎᏍᏗ ᏨᏍᎩᏃ ᎠᏥᎸᏱ. ᎾᏍᎩ ᎢᏳᏍᏗ ᎢᏳᏃ ᎠᏥᎸᎨᎳᏍᏗᏱ ᎯᏲᎯᎮᏍᏗ ᏣᏓᏁᏗ, ᎾᎿᎭᏃ ᎢᎭᏅᏓᏗᏍᎨᏍᏗ ᏗᏍᏓᏓᏅᏟ ᎪᎱᏍᏗ ᏤᎵᏎᎲᎢ, ᎾᎿᎭᎠᏥᎸ-ᎨᎳᏍᏗᏱ ᎯᎯᏯᏍᎨᏍᏗ ᏣᏓᏁᏗ ᎠᎴ ᎭᏓᏅᏍᎨᏍᏗ, ᎢᎬᏱ ᎣᏍᏛ ᏂᏍᏛᏁᎮᏍᏗ ᏗᏍᏓᏓᏅᏟ; ᎩᎳᏃ ᎯᎷᎨᏍᏗ ᎭᎵᏍᎪᎸᏗᏍᎨᏍᏗ ᏣᏓᏁᏗ. ᏄᎳᏉ ᎣᏍᏛ ᏂᏍᏛ ᏣᏱᎵᏙᎯ, ᎠᏏᏉ ᎢᏍᏓᎢᏒᎢ, ᏗᎫᎪᏗᏍᎩᏱᎾᏏ ᏫᏱᏣᎧᎲᎦ ᏣᏱᎵᏙᎯ, ᏗᎫᎪᏗᏍᎩᏃ ᏗᏓᏂᏱᏍᎩᏱ ᏫᏱᏣᎧᎲᎦ, ᎠᎴ ᏗᏓᏍᏚᏗᏱ ᏱᏪᏣᏴᏓ. ᎤᏙᎯᏳᎯᏯ ᎯᎠ ᏂᎬᏪᏎᎭ, ᎥᏝ ᏴᏛᎦᎯᏄᎪᎢ, ᎬᏂ ᎤᎵᏍᏆᎸᏗ ᎠᏰᎵᎢᏯᏓᏅᏖᏗ ᎭᎫᏴᎲᎭ. ᎢᏣᏛᎦᏅᎯ ᎢᎩ ᎯᎠ ᏥᏂᎨᏥᏪᏎᎴ ᎡᏘ ᏣᏁᎮᎢ; ᏞᏍᏗ ᏣᏓᏲᏁᎸᎩ. ᎠᏎᏃ ᎠᏴ ᎯᎠ ᏂᏨᏪᏎᎭ; ᎩᎶ ᎠᎨᏴ ᏓᎧᏂᏍᎨᏍᏗ ᏧᎾᏂᏏᏗᏱ ᎤᏚᎵᏍᎨᏍᏗ, ᎦᏳᎳ ᎤᏓᏲᏁᎸᎯ ᎨᏎᏍᏗ ᏧᏓᏅᏛᎢ. ᎢᏳᏃ ᎯᎦᏙᎵ ᎯᎦᏘᏏ ᏕᏦᏕᏍᏗᏍᎨᏍᏗ, ᎭᏓᎦᏖᏙᎢᏍᎨᏍᏗ, ᎠᎴ ᏣᏕᎨᏍᏗ; ᎣᏏᏳᏰᏃ ᎢᏣᎵᏍᏓᏁᏗ ᏌᏉᏉ ᏣᎵᎬᎭᎸᏛ ᏱᏣᏲᎱᏎᎭ, ᎠᏃ ᎤᏃᏍᏛ ᎯᏰᎸ ᏨᏍᎩᏃ ᏫᏰᏣᏓᎢᏁᎭ. ᎢᏳᏃ ᏦᏰᏂ ᎯᎦᏘᏏ ᏕᏦᏕᏍᏗᏍᎨᏍᏗ, ᎯᏍᏆᎵᏍᎨᏍᏗ, ᎠᎴ ᏣᏕᎨᏍᏗ; ᎣᏏᏳᏰᏃ ᎢᏣᎵᏍᏓᏁᏗ ᏌᏉᏉ ᏣᎵᎬᎭᎸᏛ ᏱᏣᏲᎱᏎᎭ, ᎠᏃ ᎤᏃᏍᏛ ᎯᏰᎸ ᏨᏍᎩᏃ ᏫᏰᏣᏓᎢᏁᎭ. ᎯᎠ ᎢᎦᏪᏛ ᎢᎩ; ᎩᎶ ᎤᏓᎵᎢ ᎢᎦᎧᎲᏍᎨᏍᏗ, ᎦᏅᏁᎮᏍᏗ ᎪᏪᎵ ᎾᏍᎩ ᏚᎾᎦᎴᏅᎲᎢ. ᎠᏎᏃ ᎠᏴ ᎯᎠ ᏂᏨᏪᏎᎭ; ᎩᎶ ᎤᏓᎵᎢ ᎢᎦᎧᎲᏍᎨᏍᏗ, ᏧᏂᏏᏅᎯᏍᎩᏂᏃᏅ ᎢᎨᏎᏍᏗ, ᎤᏓᏲᏁᏗᏱᏉ ᏂᎬᏂᏌᏁᎮᏍᏗ; ᎩᎶᏃ ᎠᏥᎧᏅᎯ ᎠᏓᏰᎨᏍᏗ ᎠᏓᏲᏁᎮᏍᏗ. ᎠᎴ ᎢᏣᏛᎦᏅᎯ ᎢᎩ ᎯᎠ ᏥᏂᎨᏥᏪᏎᎴ ᎡᏘ ᏣᏁᎮᎢ; ᏞᏍᏗ ᏣᏲᏍᏔᏅ ᏣᏎᎵᏔᏅᎢ, ᏱᎰᏩᏍᎩᏂ ᏂᏯᏛᏁᎮᏍᏗ ᏄᏍᏛ ᏣᏁᏨᎢ. ᎠᏎᏃ ᎠᏴ ᎯᎠ ᏂᏨᏪᏎᎭ; ᏞᏍᏗ ᏱᏣᏎᎵᏔᏁᏍᏗ ᏱᏣᏁᎢᏍᏔᏁᏍᏗ ᎪᎱᏍᏗ, ᏞᏍᏗ ᎦᎸᎳᏗ ᏱᏣᏁᎢᏍᏔᏁᏍᏗ, ᎤᏁᎳᏅᎯᏰᏃ ᎤᏪᏗᏱ ᎾᏍᎩ; ᏞᏍᏗ ᎠᎴ ᎡᎶᎯ, ᏧᎳᏏᏗᏱᏰᏃ ᎾᏍᎩ; ᎠᎴ ᏥᎷᏏᎵᎻ, ᎾᏍᎩᏰᏃ ᎠᏥᎸᏉᏗ ᎤᎬᏫᏳᎯ ᎤᏤᎵ ᎦᏚᎲᎢ; ᏞᏍᏗ ᎠᎴ ᎯᏍᎪᎵ ᏱᏣᏁᎢᏍᏔᏁᏍᏗ, ᏝᏰᏃ ᏰᎵ ᏌᏉ ᎩᏢ ᎤᏁᎬ ᎠᎴ ᎬᎿᎭᎨ ᏱᏅᎦᎲᎦ. ᎢᏥᏁᎬᏍᎩᏂ ᎯᎠ ᏄᏍᏕᏍᏗ, ᎥᎥ, ᎥᎥ; ᎥᏝ, ᎥᏝ; ᎤᏟᏰᏃ ᏥᏂᎦᎣ ᎤᏲᏉ ᎨᏒ ᏗᏓᎴᏂᏍᎪᎢ. ᎢᏣᏛᎦᏅᎯ ᎢᎩ ᎯᎠ ᎢᎦᏪᏛ ᎨᏒᎢ, ᎠᎦᏔ ᎠᎦᏔᏉ ᏓᎬᏩᎸᏍᎨᏍᏗ, ᎧᏳᎦᏃ ᎧᏳᎦᏉ ᏓᎬᏩᎸᏍᎨᏍᏗ. ᎠᏎᏃ ᎠᏴ ᎯᎠ ᏂᏣᏪᏎᎭ; ᏞᏍᏗ ᏱᏣᏞᎨᏍᏗ ᎤᏐᏅ ᏁᏨᏁᎸᎢ; ᎩᎶᏍᎩᏂ ᎯᎦᏘᏏ ᏣᎪᏇᎷᎲᏍᎨᏍᏗ, ᏐᎢ ᎾᏍᏉ ᎯᏯᎵᏍᎪᎸᏓᏁᎮᏍᏗ. ᎩᎶᏃ ᎤᏚᎵᏍᎨᏍᏗ ᏣᏱᎵᏓᏍᏗᏱ, ᎠᎴ ᏣᎾᎡᏗᏱ ᎭᏫᏂ ᏣᏄᏬ, ᎤᏛᏃᎯ ᎾᏍᏉ ᎯᏅᏁᎮᏍᏗ. ᎩᎶᏃ ᏑᏟᎶᏛ ᎢᏍᏕᏅᏍᏗᏱ ᏂᏨᏁᎮᏍᏗ, ᏔᎵ ᎢᏳᏟᎶᏛ ᎢᏍᏕᎨᏍᏗ. ᏣᏔᏲᏎᎯ ᎯᏁᎮᏍᏗ, ᏣᏙᎸᎡᏗᏱᏃ ᎤᏚᎵᏍᎩ ᏞᏍᏗ ᎢᏴᏛ ᎢᎯᏯᏛᏁᎸᎩ. ᎢᏣᏛᎦᏅᎯ ᎢᎩ ᎯᎠ ᎢᎦᏪᏛ ᎨᏒᎢ; ᎯᎨᏳᏎᏍᏗ ᎾᎥ ᎢᏗᏍᏓᏓᎳ, ᎯᏍᎦᎨᏍᏗᏃ ᏣᏍᎦᎩ. ᎠᏎᏃ ᎠᏴ ᎯᎠ ᏂᏨᏪᏎᎭ; ᏕᏥᎨᏳᏎᏍᏗ ᎨᏥᏍᎦᎩ; ᎣᏍᏛ ᏕᏥᏁᏤᎮᏍᏗ ᎨᏥᏍᎩᏅᏗᏍᎩ, ᎣᏍᏛ ᏂᏕᏣᏛᏁᎮᏍᏗ ᎨᏥᏂᏆᏘᎯ, ᎠᎴ ᎣᏍᏛ ᎢᏳᎾᎵᏍᏓᏁᏗᏱ ᎢᏣᏓᏙᎵᏍᏗᏍᎨᏍᏗ ᎦᏰᎪᎩ ᎨᏥᏃᎮᏍᎩ ᎠᎴ ᎤᏲ ᎢᎨᏨᏁᎯ. ᎾᏍᎩᏃ ᎦᎸᎳᏗ ᎡᎯ ᎢᏥᏙᏓ ᏧᏪᏥ ᏂᏣᎵᏍᏗᏍᎨᏍᏗ; ᎾᏍᎩᏰᏃ ᎤᏤᎵ ᏅᏙ ᏕᎦᎾᏄᎪᏫᏎᎰ ᎤᏂᏲ ᎠᎴ ᎠᏃᏍᏛ, ᎠᎴ ᏓᎦᏅᏓᏁᎰ ᎤᎾᏓᏅᏘ ᎠᎴ ᎤᏂᏁᎫᏥᏛ. ᎢᏳᏰᏃ ᏱᏗᏥᎨᏳᎭ ᎨᏥᎨᏳᎯ, ᎦᏙ ᏰᏣᎫᏴᏓᏏ? ᏝᏍᎪ ᎾᏍᎩ ᏱᎾᎾᏛᏁᎰ ᎠᏰᎵ-ᎠᏕᎸ ᎠᏂᎩᏏᏙᎯ? ᎢᏳ ᎠᎴ ᎢᏣᏓᏅᏟᏉ ᎤᏅᏒ ᏱᏗᏥᏲᎵᎭ, ᎦᏙ ᎢᏣᏛᏁᎲ ᏕᏥᎪᎾᏛᏗ ᎠᏂᏐᎢ? ᏝᏍᎪ ᎾᏍᎩ ᏱᎾᎾᏛᏁᎰ ᎠᏰᎵ-ᎠᏕᎸ ᎠᏂᎩᏏᏙᎯ? ᏂᎯᏍᎩᏂ ᏂᏥᏍᎦᏅᎾ ᎨᏎᏍᏗ ᎾᏍᎩᏯ ᎢᏥᏙᏓ ᎦᎸᎳᏗ ᎡᎯ ᎾᏍᎦᏅᎾ ᏥᎩ.

Page 1 of 1112345...10...Last »